My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/22/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
5/22/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:13 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:26:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/22/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Wodtke believed May Zima was qualified, but <br />just wanted to make sure we are paying the proper costs. <br />Director Fry stated this would be the fourth time the County <br />has gone with May Zima and this price also includes the South <br />County Fire District. <br />Administrator Wright suggested that if the Board decides to <br />get other proposals, that we start from scratch rather than <br />selectively open it, but Commissioner Scurlock recalled that when <br />we went to another firm some years ago, we were sorry we did and <br />ended up having May Zima back the next year. <br />Director Fry advised that May Zima's cost of $53,500 was up <br />100 over last year's price, but we are going to a single audit <br />approach which entails more compliance testing on federal and <br />state grants than has been done before. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, that the Board approve going out <br />for proposals on an annual audit contract. <br />Under discussion,.Commissioner Scurlock stated he planned to <br />vote against the Motion, because the whole purpose of the request <br />is to extend the plan and he didn't feel that this year's cost of <br />$53,500 had increased that much. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked if the present contract is <br />negotiable, and Director Barton pointed out that the present <br />3 -year contract had been negotiated already and their original <br />proposal was more than this price. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was <br />voted on and failed by a vote of 3-2, Commissioners <br />Lyons, Bowman, and Scurlock dissenting. <br />11 <br />� MAY 2 2 1985 <br />BOOK f`°�11 <br />U �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.