Laserfiche WebLink
Fr - <br />JUN 5 1985 <br />JAIL COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONTRACT <br />BOOK 61 F' a 81 <br />Administrator Wright reviewed memo of General Services <br />Director Dean, as follows: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: May 28, 1985 FILE: <br />the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />THRU: Michael Wright <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: H. T. "Sonny can <br />Director <br />General Servi es <br />SUBJECT: Jail Computer Software <br />Contract <br />REFERENCES: <br />On January 22, 1985, we entered into the subject contract to <br />computerize the jail operations. In the original scope of work, all <br />inmate paperwork and accounting records were included. When this <br />contract was negotiated, staff failed to take into consideration, or <br />be aware that software was available for the Inmate Welfare Fund <br />accounting. Since this is a D.O.C. mandated program and requires a <br />large amount of paperwork and accountability, staff feels the package <br />is necessary to complete the computerization of jail records. <br />Therefore, it is recommended that approval be given to extend the <br />H.T.E. Contract and allow an expenditure of $3,000 to cover the cost. <br />Funds will come from Operating Budget. <br />The Administrator informed the Board that the Clerk's Data <br />Processing Department is unable to do this work for them as they <br />simply do not have the manpower, and he therefore, would request <br />that the Board extend the contract as recommended. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know if Data Processing has <br />looked at this company, and Chairman Lyons confirmed that they <br />have and they are pleased that it was picked. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, Commissioner Bird being <br />delayed, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved <br />extending the contract with H.T.E., Inc., and <br />allowed an expenditure of $3,000 to cover the <br />cost as recommended by staff. <br />40 <br />