Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Brandenburg felt there was no problem with changing <br />the word "transient" to "recreational", as far as the ordinance <br />is concerned, as he believed that some of the residents out there <br />do not consider themselves transients. In addition, with respect <br />to Paragraph (5) on Page 1 as it relates to the Zoning Code, the <br />hotel would be an existing non -conforming use and could not be <br />rebuilt if it burned down. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that maybe we should find a way to <br />make the hotel an allowable use because it seemed to him that a <br />hotel was appropriate for the area. <br />Attorney Brandenburg suggested that if the Board wished to <br />make the hotel allowable, the way to accomplish that would be to <br />change the wording in the zoning amendment coming up next by <br />saying that everything that is currently there as of the date of <br />this ordinance constitutes a legal conforming use, which would <br />allow the motel or anything else that exists out there to be <br />rebuilt if it burned down. <br />Commissioner Bowman had a problem with the wording <br />"delineated development" used in the second paragraph on Page 1 <br />of the ordinance and preferred that the legal descriptions be <br />spelled out as insurance against future claims of being <br />grandfathered in. <br />Attorney Brandenburg advised that the zoning ordinance <br />references a recorded sketch of the development, which is the <br />most definite record we have of what exists out there today. <br />Chairman Lyons opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. There were none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />29 <br />JUN 12 1985 BOOK FADE <br />