My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/19/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
6/19/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:13 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/19/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 19 1985 <br />BOOK <br />attached, <br />which staff recommends that the Board adopt, <br />which <br />specifies that the Board is affirming and adopting this plan and <br />requesting that the Economic Development Administration designate <br />the county as a redevelopment area. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed the Committee and staff have <br />done an excellent job, but he believed that some of his comments <br />about vocational education were taken the wrong way by the Press <br />and he would like to clarify this. The way his remarks were <br />interpreted by the Press seemed to indicate that he criticized <br />the vocational education program while actually he believed the <br />existing program is good considering what resources they have to <br />work with, but that it in no way meets the requirements of a <br />really good vocational education program. Commissioner Scurlock <br />stressed that he is very supportive of vocational education in <br />this community and feels we need to be much more aggressive and <br />broaden our programs, not lessen them. <br />Commissioner Bowman wished to reiterate her comments at the <br />workshop that when industry looks at an area, they look for <br />infrastructure. She did not see much reference in this report to <br />our lack of infrastructure and wished it would state not only <br />that the county has allocated land for commercial/industrial <br />development, but also note that there is no infrastructure. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt it should be the thrust to develop <br />infrastructure in one particular area which perhaps could be <br />referred to as an industrial park, and she believed that would <br />give the report much more clout. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we now are in the process of <br />providing water to our biggest industrial node at 1-95, and <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed that this will be much clearer <br />when our consultants come back with our Master Plan for sewer and <br />water and for extending service to nodes, especially Fellsmere <br />which he felt is a key area. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.