Laserfiche WebLink
time sheet basis, that would be impractical due to the extensive <br />amount of detail involved. <br />Director Fry explained that when this system was developed, <br />it resulted in a fairly simple way of charging the indirect cost; <br />it is not perfect, however, due to the different sizes and <br />demands of each department. For example, the Utilities <br />Department has had a big demand on the Legal Department lately, <br />but has not had that much effect on Personnel or Purchasing. <br />Administrator Wright suggested that the Board take these <br />figures under advisement today and staff will fine tune the <br />process during the budget hearings. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />authorized staff to use the formula as set out <br />in the above memo for the budget hearings. <br />BUDGET APPROVAL POLICY BY FUND TYPE <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/19/85: <br />. June 19, 1985 <br />T0: ' Board of County CommCi�ssioners <br />FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton, OMB Director & Edwin M. Fry, Jr., Finance Director <br />SUBJECT: Budget Approval Policy by Fund Type <br />a .. <br />The Budget process can.-be.divided into two parts:. <br />1. Workshop Hearings <br />2. Public Hearings <br />a. tenative budget adoption <br />b. final budget adoption <br />The two parts involve a review of all County operations in all fund types. This <br />process can be stream -lined by eliminating the budget adoption process on those _ <br />operations which are long term in nature. The following is a list of the fund <br />types used by Indian River County. <br />000 — OPERATING GROUP OF ACCOUNTS <br />(General Fund & M.S.T.U.) <br />100 - SPECIAL REVENUE GROUP OF ACCOUNTS <br />(Federal Revenue Sharing, Police Academy, Sheriff's Fund, Secondary <br />Road Trust, Fire Districts, Street Lighting Districts) <br />11 <br />JUN 26 1985 BOOK 34 <br />J <br />