My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/21/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
8/21/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:37:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/21/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Bird asked what the Transportation Committee <br />plans were for the future of Old Dixie as he felt this is one <br />road that is getting away from us in regard to being able to <br />control traffic. <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock agreed that Old Dixie is a nightmare <br />in some spots, especially north from the bowling alley where it <br />is so restricted that there is virtually no ability to expand the <br />roadway. As you move to the south, the situation does get a <br />little better and has some flexibility. In his opinion, however, <br />it would be extremely difficult to effect any substantial change <br />in Old Dixie without having to go to mass condemnation. <br />Commissioner Bird believed that we might have to change our <br />thinking in the Comprehensive Plan in regard to a blanket <br />provision that no development would be allowed that would exceed <br />a traffic service level of "C". He didn't think we could put a <br />moratorium on development along Old Dixie just because of those <br />requirements, and he further pointed out that any type of <br />development will throw us over Level of Service "C". <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock agreed there are certain situations <br />in the county where there is no effective solution to this <br />problem. <br />Mr. Shearer emphasized that there is a great deal of <br />difference between traffic generated by multiple family and that <br />generated by commercial. <br />Planning & Development Director Robert Keating stressed that <br />having a level of service sets a standard and says this is the <br />maximum amount of inconvenience someone will put up with. �In <br />this case, staff is saying that the Comprehensive Plan envisions <br />Old Dixie as a completely different type of road than U.S.1, for <br />instance, and we are looking at maintaining it as that type of <br />road based on the types of land uses that are allowed adjacent to <br />it. Multi -family residential really is a very low trip <br />generation rate type of land use. He pointed out that heavy <br />commercial districts attract far fewer trips than a general <br />commercial district which has retail sales. <br />50 <br />L_ AUG 211985 <br />BOOK 61 PA -IE ®47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.