My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/4/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
9/4/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:38:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP <br />4 <br />1985 <br />BOOK 61 <br />FnE y 2 <br />getting eye and lung trouble. <br />She noted that some people <br />are <br />afraid paving would turn the street into a racetrack, but she was <br />in favor of paving and getting rid of the dust and then dealing <br />with the speeders. <br />Carl Johnson, resident of 92nd Avenue, and member of the <br />MSTU Advisory Committee, commented that he also went out to Vero <br />Lake Estates to retire and he does agree that water dispersal is <br />the number one priority and the easements must be cleaned. He <br />believed the easements are owned by the county, but stated that <br />he has never seen one cleaned in the five years he has been <br />there. Mr. Johnson wished to justify the position taken by the <br />Advisory Committee and their recommendation. He reported in <br />detail the efforts taken to contact residents of the area and <br />have them participate in the advisory committee meetings, stating <br />that he personally handed out notices, but the only ones who ever <br />attended were from the Property Owners Association, and John <br />Bradley, Mr. Ansin's representative, has never come to a meeting <br />or voiced an opinion. Mr. Johnson was happy to see that at last <br />some interest has been aroused. He then reviewed how the Advisory <br />Committee came up with their recommendation for an assessment of <br />$100 per parcel/acre and objected that this amount was lessened <br />and they were never notified. <br />Mr. Johnson wished to go on record that greater emphasis <br />should be put on cleaning the easements in back of everyone's <br />property. He stated that no one has the right to stop free <br />flowing water and talked about trees in the canal, noting that if <br />they were cut out the water would drain into the estuary. Mr. <br />Johnson was definitely in favor of paving 87th St. and 101st <br />Ave., which he believed would benefit everyone in the area. <br />Joe McBride, 9225 87th St., did not agree that paving 87th <br />St. would benefit him because it is a racetrack as it is and this <br />would just result in faster traffic. He concurred with Attorney <br />Clem that the original intent was to assess $5.00 or $10.00 per <br />parcel/acre for a drainage study, and that is what he would like <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.