My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/4/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
9/4/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:38:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/04/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to see done. He then spoke of the plugged up culverts and the <br />size of them, noting that he had spoken of this to Commissioner <br />Bowman who promised to come out and look but has not done so yet. <br />Rita Hudman, 101st Ave., noted that the assessment would <br />cost her $100, and she did not want to pay $100 for paving which <br />will neither solve the drainage problem nor benefit her. <br />John Bradley, representative of landholder Edmund Ansin, <br />explained that the reason he didn't attend the meetings was that <br />he went the wrong night for the first meeting, and did not attend <br />the second meeting because the figure of $100 per parcel/acre had <br />been brought up and that wasn't Mr. Ansin's idea; $10.00 per <br />parcel/acre was the only fee ever mentioned to him. <br />The Vice Chairman noted that Mr. Bradley could have attended <br />the meeting and opposed the $100 assessment, but Mr. Bradley <br />stated that his one vote would not count. <br />Commissioner Bird asked Public Works Director Davis if, in <br />his professional opinion, we need a drainage study and plan for <br />this area or whether he felt the existing drainage there would be <br />adequate if it had additional work. <br />Director Davis stated that the drainage is not adequate, and <br />basically the reason is because of the constriction in the <br />outfall canal which serves 23,000 acres of land that he knows of, <br />which is a very large portion of the county. When you are <br />draining that much water into a canal, you need to determine your <br />pro rata share of that canal's capacity. Once that is determined, <br />you then need a complete topography in order to determine the <br />most feasible way to retain the water so you can pass only your <br />pro rata share of capacity. We, therefore, need a study to <br />determine what capacity the subdivision can benefit from and <br />where the water should be retained before it goes to the canal. <br />Director Davis further emphasized that there are 77 miles of <br />roads in this subdivision that are unpaved; they are graded and <br />crowned and when it rains, the silt does go into the culverts. <br />11 <br />SEP 4 19 BOOKS FnE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.