Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 41995 BOOK 61 NaGF 966 <br />about, and Attorney Clem felt that $10.00 still would be <br />consistent with what was first talked about and could raise <br />enough to fund a study and move ahead to solve the drainage <br />problems. <br />Mr. McBride commented that Mr. Johnson stated that nobody <br />attended the Property Owners Association meetings, but he <br />believed you had to be a member to have a voice and vote. He <br />further did not feel it is fair that those whose homes were worth <br />less than $25,000 do not have to pay. <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock informed him that Mr. Johnson was <br />referring to the Advisory Committee not the Property Owners <br />Association, and he also explained that the per parcel/acre <br />assessment method was used specifically to eliminate the problem <br />with the Homestead Exemption. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY Commissioner Bird, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, to reduce the levy for Vero <br />Lake Estates MSTU for fiscal year 1985-86 from <br />$50.00 to $15.00 per parcel/acre with the under- <br />standing that the number one priority would be <br />a drainage plan and -that any funds left over <br />will be used for additional drainage maintenance <br />work in the area. <br />Commissioner Wodtke expressed concern over having a total <br />plan for both drainage and roads as it seems the Motion is just <br />for a drainage plan and then drainage maintenance. He wanted to <br />know if we will be able to get to a point in a year where we can <br />get into paving of roads. <br />14 <br />