9/11/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SES 1 195 BOOK i PAGE P�! "contiguous" in the new provisions wouldn't apply to the old standards. The week following the adoption of the new standards, the Board approved a node based on the old standards for ACTS. and ACTS reduced their request to three acres. Based on this, the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of his clients request for rezoning three acres to C -1A. Attor- ney Caldwell contended that based on the old standards, they are part of a neighborhood node, and if granted it would be six acres. He believed in previous discussions it has been noted that SR 60 is not the typical neighborhood node situation, which generally occurs on secondary roads as opposed to main arterials. He then asked if the C -1A zoning category is still on the books, and Planner Shearer stated that it is, but it will be changed. Question arose as to what new category is most comparable to C -1A, and Director Keating believed it probably would be CN, which was particularly established for neighborhood nodes. After further discussion re categories, Attorney Caldwell stated that he would like to stay with C -1A at this time. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously closed the public hearing. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, to adopt Ordinance 85-76 rezoning the said 3 acres from RM -6 to C -1A as requested. Commissioner Wodtke noted that he voted against the Motion for the ACTS node, but it was approved based on the old criteria. To be consistent he would like to vote against this Motion also, but in fairness, he felt this should be allowed. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. 30