Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 18 1955 BOOK,��' <br />Mr. Thornton pointed out that it says "subdivided", and he <br />believed that if you divide it into 50 ft. lots, it is <br />subdivided. <br />Director Keating felt that the disclaimer in the ordinance <br />reflected any active subdivision which had received preliminary <br />plan approval and which had not come in yet to clear the right- <br />of-way. However, a tree removal permit would still be required <br />for non-residential lots and also for residential lots of one <br />acre or more. <br />Attorney Vitunac suggested that this item be recessed until <br />he had an opportunity to meet with Mr. Thornton re his inter- <br />pretation of the definitions under the tree ordinance. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously recessed <br />this matter until later in this meeting. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF SITE PLAN DENIAL - BILL LAW <br />The hour of 9:30 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy <br />Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication <br />attached, to wit: <br />42 <br />