My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/11/1985 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
9/11/1985 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK F�1ut <br />Attorney Block pointed out that the Simmons property is <br />sitting between two pieces of property, one of which is existing <br />commercial, and the other is a mobile home park that has been <br />developing over a period of five years. He noted that they have <br />access to other roads, while the Simmons property has access only <br />to Oslo Road. <br />Commissioner Bird recommended that Mrs. Simmons wait for a <br />couple of years until the area is more developed and there is <br />justification for expanding the node and considering her property <br />for inclusion in the node. <br />Elizabeth Mason, owner of the southwest corner of the <br />intersection in question, stated she was hoping that the Board <br />would not delay their decision today just because someone <br />suddenly discovered that they were not in included in the node. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, that the Board adopt <br />Ordinance 85-79, providing for the delineation of <br />boundaries for the 50 -acre commercial node at Oslo <br />Road and 27th Avenue, as recommended by staff. <br />0 <br />Under discussion, Director Keating advised Attorney Block <br />that the process had been changed and a request for nodal <br />expansion could be reviewed every six months. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was <br />voted on and carried unanimously. <br />66 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.