My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/16/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:11:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CA <br />On January 23, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners rezoned 30.8 <br />acres of land east and west of the subject property from C-1 to <br />single-family. The subject property was not included in that request <br />because it contained an existing commercial use. <br />On August 22, 1985, the Planning and Zoning Commission tabled action <br />on these requests. <br />On September 12, 1985, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4--to-0 <br />to recommend approval of both of these requests. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section,'an analysis of the reasonableness of the application <br />will be presented. The analysis will include a description of the <br />current and future land uses of the site and surrounding areas, <br />potential impacts on the transportation and utility systems, and any, <br />significant adverse impacts on environmental quality. ' <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property contains a grove caretaking business. North of <br />the subject property, across Oslo Road, are vacant lots zoned M-1, <br />Restricted Industrial District, and vacant lots and single-family <br />dwellings zoned C-1. Further north are single-family dwellings and <br />vacant lots zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 <br />units/acre). East of the subject property are single=family dwell- <br />ings, a church and vacant land zoned RS -6 on the south side of Oslo <br />Road; and a pool hall, grocery store, single-family dwellings, and <br />vacant land zoned C-1 on the north side of Oslo Road. South of the <br />subject property is vacant land zoned C-1 and single-family dwellings <br />and vacant land zoned RS -6. West of the subject property are single- <br />family dwellings and vacant land zoned RS -6 --on the south side `of Oslo <br />Road; and single-family dwellings and vacant lots zoned C-1, and <br />warehouses, auto repair facilities, auto cleaning businesses, and <br />other heavy commercial uses zoned M-1 on the north side of Oslo Road. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates the north three hundred feet of the <br />subject property and the land north and west of it as part of the Oslo <br />Road MXD, Mixed -Use District (up to 6 units/acre). The south one <br />hundred feet of the subject property and the land east, south, and <br />west of it is designated as LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2 (up to 6 <br />units/acre). <br />While the staff recommended denial of the applicant's original Compre- <br />hensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests for this property, the <br />staff and the applicant's attorney met to work out problems staff had <br />with the original request. Staff's main problem was extending the MXD <br />area to cover undeveloped lands where conditions have not changed <br />since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. However, the amended <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests cover only the part <br />of the applicants' property currently in commercial use. <br />Staff feels that since the south 100 feet of the subject property is <br />currently in commercial use that it could more reasonably be included <br />in the, MXD area to the north than the LD -2 land use designation to <br />the south. The requested CH zoning is consistent with the County's <br />recent rezoning of 28 acres west of the subject property from C-1 to <br />CH and would allow less intense land uses than the M-1 zoning to the <br />north. <br />27 <br />OCT �9� BOOK 'PAGE 418 <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.