My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/23/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:12:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
process enables area governments and agenpies that do not have <br />jurisdiction over the project a chance to review and comment <br />on the project. The D.R.I. process also enables the Regional <br />Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) <br />n..,and the project applicant an opportunity to appeal any local <br />government actions or issued requirements in connection with <br />the application for D.R.I. approval. <br />The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (T.C.R.P.C.) has <br />coordinated the review of the Grand Harbor project and has <br />submitted, in the form of official recommendations, an <br />assessment of the regional impacts of the project. The <br />Planning Council coordinated the first part of the D.R.I. <br />reviets process, following these general steps: <br />1) Pre -application conference with T.C.R.P.C. and other <br />affected agencies and government entities; <br />2) Formal application for development approval (ADA), which <br />includes proposals, and supporting information; <br />3) Review process involving all affected agencies and <br />government entities submitting comments and questions <br />regarding the ADA; <br />4) Responses from the applicant; [note: several rounds of <br />questions and responses ensued]; <br />5) T.C.R.P.C. notification to the County that all questions <br />and comments adequately had been addressed - known as a <br />letter of sufficiency; <br />6) T.C.R.P.C. public hearing on the project; approval of a <br />report and recommendations regarding the regional impacts <br />of the project; <br />7) T.C.R.P.C. transmittal of its official report and <br />recommendations to the County [received September 30, <br />1985]. <br />The last phase of the D.R.I. review process is coordinated and <br />controlled by the County. The remaining steps in the process <br />are generally as follows: <br />1) The Board of County Commissioners, after reviewing <br />T.C.R.P.C.'s recommendations and local staff recommenda- <br />tions, approves, approves with conditions, or denies the <br />ADA. <br />(a) If the Board approves the ADA, the approval and any <br />conditions attached to the approval are included in <br />a development order. The development order is the <br />basic agreement between the local government and the <br />applicant. The development order vests the appli- <br />cant with the right to develop the proposed project <br />in accordance with the terms specified in the <br />development order. <br />(b) 'If the Board denies the ADA, the Board must specify <br />the reasons for denying the application. <br />2) The development order is issued by the County as a <br />Zesolutiopa to be recorded. <br />e��Lt4�V 3) The issued development order is transmitted to the State, <br />T.C.R.P.C., and the developer. Within 45 days after the <br />order is rendered, the State, T.C.R.P.C., 'the developer, <br />91 <br />Boa 62 PmuE 550 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.