10/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� r r than willing to make a cash contribution in lieu of building a shelter. The developer Richard Schaub stated that he would hate to build something and then give a cash contribution also, and Attorney Vitunac suggested the following words be added to the first sentence in Condition 43 - "or shall provide an equivalent in cash contribution." It was agreed to include the language suggested by Attorney Vitunac. Commissioner Scurlock next addressed the Transportation Section, commenting that he has been extensively involved with transportation. It is an area that needs particular attention because the impact is substantial and involves phasing. The key basically is the U.S.I corridor, and they have identified the necessity of building Indian River Boulevard and the main intersection is 53rd Street. Commissioner Bird asked what contribution the developer is making toward construction of Indian River Boulevard. Public Works Director Davis explained that he would be making the impact fee contribution as it relates to the impact fee zone he is in. When he comes to the end of Phase I, if there are not enough impact fees in the account for that zone to build the Boulevard, then he would have to build the Boulevard as a two lane facility as a minimum because his project only demands two lanes of roadway capacity for that next phase. He would either have to pay the premium of accelerating that road project or wait. The right-of-way is included in the impact fee capital improvement program, and the developer would get credit for his donation of right-of-way. Commissioner Bird commented that it seems the developer doesn't really need the Boulevard to a great degree to develop his project because hi.s main entrance road looks as if it goes under the Boulevard. 101 OCT 423 1985 BOOK 62 PAGE 560