10/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OCT 2 3 1995 BOOK 62 Fac 561 Director Davis stated that the developer will have a connection to the Boulevard because he will need the Boulevard when a certain number of trips are generated for the project; what goes under the Boulevard is a golf cart tunnel. Commissioner Scurlock noted that basically the project stresses U.S.I and the only alternate route feasible is Indian River Boulevard. Whether the developer uses it or not, he has to lighten the load. Commissioner Wodtke brought up Condition 53 in regard to receiving building permits and stated he would assume this means that Indian River Boulevard would have to connect all the way to current Indian River Boulevard; this was confirmed. Commissioner Wodtke noted that the Boulevard at one time was thought of as a two lane road, and he asked if we have made an area that is two lane in a four lane road. Commissioner Scurlock believed when we build Indian River Boulevard, we will build it as four lane. Planner Boling noted that under Condition 56 re construction of entrance intersections, they need to make a further condition about the signalization. Director Davis advised that since that signal is warranted by the project and we now are going with a split "T" intersection rather than one four-way intersection, they wanted to insert wording requiring that the developer would fund the signalization as well as yearly maintenance and synchronization of that signal to the other signals on U.S.I to have an integrated system on the corridor. This wording should be added under 56 (a) where it talks about westbound movement: "The developer shall fund the cost of signalization construction, maintenance, and all operational cost involved with the signalization." This was agreed upon. Commissioner Bird stated that under Condition 63 entitled Education, Police_ Protection, Fire Protection, he would like to add "Recreation." He pointed out that with a project of this 102