Laserfiche WebLink
available to the architect but hire a person and pay him <br />ourselves instead. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that we would have to leave it <br />out of the architect's contract if this were agreeable to them. <br />Mr. Bail stated that they would be agreeable to back this <br />out of the contract, but he really did think it is much smoother <br />if it is all under one responsibility. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that if it worked, we wouldn't be <br />here today. We need documentation to protect the county, and if <br />it can work under the architect's supervision, fine, but if it <br />doesn't, he would propose we change the procedure and hire the <br />person ourselves. <br />After further discussion, Commissioner Scurlock believed the <br />indication is we will continue with the present procedure and <br />identify someone from the Commission to go out to the site on a <br />periodic basis to analyze the situation; there will be weekly <br />reports back to the Commission from the architect; and any future <br />changes either by staff or architects will come through in a <br />Change Order form on a timely basis. <br />Board members agreed, and Commissioner Wodtke was willing to <br />continue the way we have been for at least thirty days. <br />Chairman Lyons felt that if the Administrator believes he <br />should relieve Mr. Baird for more time at the new jail, then he <br />should get more personnel for the jail as we will need it at the <br />new jail anyway. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that he does not mind the <br />additional personnel, but he did not want to indicate that Mr. <br />Baird should be on the site for the purpose of monitoring <br />construction. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved <br />continuing on with the present procedure for County <br />representation on the Jail site for at least 30 days; <br />29 <br />OCT2 3 �9 BOOK '62 PAGE 478 <br />