Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion then ensued regarding access off Old Dixie, and <br />Commissioner Scurlock again stressed his belief that we need to <br />work toward marginal access off U.S.I however we accomplish it. <br />It was noted that this will be discussed at a Special <br />Meeting next week. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we have been consistent with our <br />policy or whether Mr. Law is getting caught in a transition, and <br />Director Keating stated that we are being consistent; he felt the <br />map which shows the marginal access easements we have obtained <br />along U.S.I proves this. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that what he would really like to <br />prevent is allowing people building in an area where we hope we <br />will have a road in the future. <br />Public Works Director Davis commented that we could have a <br />setback ordinance as has been done on SR 60, and Director Keating <br />pointed out that the new commercial and industrial zoning <br />districts have increased front yard setbacks and you can park in <br />those setbacks, which would facilitate this type situation. <br />Mr. McQueen argued that the Ellsworth property was <br />inconsistent; it was just approved with an entrance off U.S.I and <br />an exit onto Old Dixie; possibly that was a good compromise, but <br />they were not offered that compromise. <br />Director Keating confirmed that with Ellsworth they did <br />specify connection on Old Dixie and they were allowed to build <br />within the 401, but he noted that staff was looking at what the <br />Plan said, and it said Old Dixie will be the frontage road in the <br />area where it is that close to U.S.1. <br />Commissioner Scurlock assumed that if the developer went <br />back and came up with another scenario to access Old Dixie, then <br />we could consider it, but what is before us today is whether or <br />not we allow them to build a building within the 40' access. <br />Mr. McQueen stated that if they could still have use of the <br />setback area and it would still count in their overall density <br />and flow area, they would go ahead and concede the 25' setback. <br />c� <br />33 �jl <br />OCT2 1985 BOOK 6l.+ Pw�S <br />