My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/23/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:12:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 3 1985 Boa 62 Fnj 4.81 <br />buildings, but the only vehicle we have to acquire this marginal <br />access is when someone initiates some site plan activity with the <br />County. If we don't pursue this and continue to allow excep- <br />tions, we will never reach our goal. Commissioner Scurlock <br />believed that even though it may take us 10 to 20 years to <br />accomplish our goal, we must work at it consistently. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stressed that he would like Mr. Law at <br />least to shift the building so in the future we would not have to <br />buy a building in order to get an access road. <br />Director Keating noted that is exactly what staff is asking. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, to uphold staff's recommenda- <br />tion to acquire the marginal access and work with <br />the developer to move the building so it is not <br />sitting in that marginal access. <br />Engineer Darrell McQueen stated that the only problem they <br />have with moving the building back is that one of the uses <br />anticipated would be a tractor -trailer truck that could back up <br />to the west side of the building, and if the building is moved <br />back, it would preclude that possibility. <br />Chairman Lyons felt, in that case, the piece of land is not <br />suitable for that activity. <br />Mr. McQueen pointed out that the property is fairly small, <br />and when a big portion of it is taken for right-of-way, the <br />remainder of it may not be suitable. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that while legally it is said <br />this property is a separate entity, he believed the fact is that <br />there has been some manipulation of the property, and possibly <br />Mr. Law made it too small as a result. Maybe he can convey back <br />some property to himself to remedy this. <br />Mr. McQueen continued to argue that they did have a working <br />solution and it was changed. <br />32 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.