Laserfiche WebLink
alternatives that were suggested by both the applicant and the <br />Planning Department; however, the alternative which was sug- <br />gested in Ms. Craver's letter of September 26, 1985, was the <br />one that was settled upon by the Planning Department. We <br />would appreciate your attention to this matter. <br />Ver truly yo/urs, <br />amuel A. Block <br />SAB: J 1 <br />Enclosure C <br />`f`�'� t <br />Attorney Block did feel there is a impasse; it was their <br />suggestion that the access be 40' and on the south side of the <br />property, which is undeveloped, but the Planning Department wants <br />one all the way across the property. His client prefers the <br />other alternative because it does not interfere with the site <br />plan. Mr. Block further noted that there are existing buildings <br />to the north that would interfere with the 40' access easement. <br />Director Keating stated that while Mr. Block is technically <br />correct about no place to connect to the north in that we do not <br />have a recorded marginal access easement, we do, however, have <br />White Aluminum there, and its parking lot is structured with an <br />access drive which would fit right into a marginal access system. <br />If they ever came in for any modification, we would require them <br />to dedicate a marginal access easement through their parking lot <br />and then the system would work. The property to the south is <br />undeveloped for a significant distance, and although it will <br />require modification of the Law site plan, staff is looking at <br />this as the perfect opportunity to get the marginal access <br />easement since nothing has been built on the property. <br />Attorney Block pointed out that there are four buildings to <br />the north of White Aluminum that will sit on the easement; Also, <br />White would have to come in for an approval. Mr. Law already has <br />a site plan, and if the easement could be taken to the south <br />which needs to be developed, then he could use that site plan. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that one of the goals of the <br />Commission in our planning on U.S.I is to have marginal access. <br />We realize there are situations where there are existing <br />31 <br />CT 2 3 1985BOCK 62 PAGE 480 <br />