Laserfiche WebLink
Director Davis advised that in an industrial subdivision <br />such as this in the Oslo corridor where neighboring roads are <br />coming in with industrial type uses, he would like staff to take <br />a look at the whole subdivision. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />APPEAL OF PETITION PAVING DENIAL - S.W. 11TH LANE <br />James Lawhon came before the Board and reviewed the follow- <br />ing letter: <br />James L. Lawhon <br />PD.Box 833 <br />October 14, 1985 Vero Beach,Fla,,-- <br />32961-0833 <br />Indian River County Commissioners <br />Indian River Court House <br />Vero Beach, Fla. <br />Dear Commissioners; <br />I respectfully request a re -hearing for the petition <br />for paving S.W.11th Lane for the following reasons: <br />1. We do have 67% of the property owners on <br />the petition according to the figures <br />confirmed by Jim Davis on Oct.10,1985 <br />meeting. He recommended a rehearing to <br />resolve this problem. <br />2. Of the people who opposed the petition, <br />two of them need to move fences, one <br />will need to move a planter, the man who <br />said he flew home to speak has already <br />sold his home and waiting for -the closing. <br />Mr. Weaver who asked that his name removed <br />from the petition had not signed the petition <br />tat was being heard. <br />We realize there is a problem dealing with thru-lots <br />but we feet there has to be a fair and equitable way <br />to get the street paved. <br />Therefore we are prepared to pay the assessment for the <br />paving on the lots where houses are already built and <br />prepared to pay our fair share of the assessment for <br />our frontage. The only stipulation we are asking is <br />that the right-of-way completly cleared. <br />61n erely Yours, <br />James L. Lawhon <br />l (305) 231 7175 M <br />39 <br />OCT 2 3 1985 BOOK 62 PA,QE 4S8 <br />