My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/23/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:12:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� OCT 2 3 rasa <br />BOOK 62 PAPE 5®3 <br />project; #3 (60.73 acres) is for the resort commercial area; #4 <br />(28.38 acres) is for the shopping center along U.S.I; and #5 <br />(3.25 acres) is for the commercial marina. <br />Chairman Lyons inquired about the RS -1, and Chief Planner <br />Shearer explained that is Single Family with one unit per acre, <br />and it is for the environmentally sensitive area. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know why in the D.R.I.'s in <br />the Sebastian area there was environmentally sensitive land where <br />no density was allowed, and Planner Shearer explained that was in <br />the City of Sebastian. Our Comprehensive Plan states there is a <br />maximum density of one unit per acre for environmentally sensi- <br />tive land, and this can be transferred to the upland property, if <br />there is any. In this case we are looking at transferring all <br />that density to the upland properties. <br />Chief Planner Shearer then referred to the proposed change <br />in the nodes as set out in the table on the second page of his <br />memo. <br />Commissioner Scurlock inquired whether the proposed transfer <br />and expansion of the number of nodal acres is all within the <br />subject property and all under one ownership or if this is taking <br />away from other properties that have been designated and moving <br />it to other owners. <br />Chief Planner Shearer advised that staff did a fairly <br />detailed study of the nodes. Storm Grove Road node was desig- <br />nated 80 acres, but priorities have changed and it is felt that <br />conditions have changed since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted <br />which would justify reducing the size of the node. Also, since <br />adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, there has been no commercial <br />development at Storm Grove Road. We have a tentative boundary of <br />9.9 acres which would include both of the existingcommercial <br />uses of that area and some in -fill property. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know how the property owners <br />who were losing node property were noticed, and Planner Shearer <br />54 <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.