Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Scurlock agreed it wasn't equitable to <br />place the entire responsibility on the developer because <br />there might be situations where so much money is required up <br />front that some developments might not be built. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt this would solve a•great deal <br />of our problems, with the exception of the roads that are <br />not on the Thoroughfare Plan. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we could combine the two -- <br />get some contribution from the developer on a formula for <br />trip generations and then trigger some other mechanism such <br />as petition paving or mandatory paving, which would be fair <br />and equitable to everyone involved. <br />Director Keating explained that because most <br />developments would have to be paved before a C.O. is issued, <br />the developer has the alternatives for financing and the <br />ability to come in to the Board of County Commissioners and <br />request a forced assessment or try to get a voluntary <br />assessment. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that the City of Vero Beach <br />has a site plan paving program and when anyone has to pave a <br />portion of it, the City requires everyone on the street to <br />chip in and do the paving all at once. <br />Commissioner Bird believed the County has that vehicle <br />also, but Commissioner Scurlock felt the problem is that we <br />have such a large area and there may be a project that fits <br />in and is well designed but is a pretty good distance away <br />from the next paved road and the volume of traffic generated <br />there may not dictate immediate paving. He believed the <br />Commission has the ability to consider how much traffic <br />there is now and how much maintenance is required and then <br />at that time take the initiative and say this is a benefited <br />area and the road is going to be paved and you are going to <br />pay for it. <br />39 BOOK 62 PAGE 60� <br />OCT 11985 <br />I <br />