My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
11/13/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:15:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�NOV 13 1985 <br />this kind of residential treatment center. <br />BOOK '62 PAGE 114 <br />He advised that <br />Indian River County would not be requested.to fund the hospital- <br />based facility. <br />Commissioner Wodtke believed there is no greater need in the' <br />4 -county area than for this treatment facility and that the <br />program cost of $40 per day is quite reasonable. He preferred, <br />however, that we work out some sort of lease agreement with the <br />Mental Health Center rather than a transfer of property. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that he was planning on putting a <br />reverter clause into the transfer stipulating that if it ever <br />stops being used as a public facility, it will revert back to the <br />County. <br />Dawn Smith, Legislative Aide to State Representative Dale <br />Patchett, reported that he would be very happy to submit a bill <br />to the Legislature requesting funding for this program. <br />State Attorney Coulton and Attorney Smith of the Public <br />Defenders Office both expressed their support of the program but <br />felt the big battle will be getting it through the Legislature. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wodtke, Commissioner Bird being <br />temporarily delayed, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />instructed the County Attorney to proceed in <br />conveying that property over to the Mental Health <br />Center. <br />Attorney Vitunac asked whether this would be subject to a <br />reverter clause or if it would be a straight deed, and <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed the intent of the Motion was that <br />the County Attorney be authorized to negotiate to come up with <br />what is acceptable because he felt it is going to be a process of <br />working with the State to see what requirements they may or may <br />not place on this. <br />6 <br />® � r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.