My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/4/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
12/4/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:32 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:18:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/04/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
swings, portable toilets, and one permanent wood dock on each <br />side of the island. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that we needed money for <br />maintenance, security, etc., in order to be able to complete this <br />project. He believed that now, with the information Mr. Earman <br />has given us, we can move forward, and he felt we owe it to him <br />to be the lead county in getting our request in. Commissioner <br />Wodtke then raised the question of whose responsibility it is to <br />remove derelicts from the Indian River. Apparently the Corps of <br />Engineers can only remove them if they interfere with navigation; <br />so, if these derelicts are not in the channel, it seems nobody <br />has any jurisdiction over them. Commissioner Wodtke discussed <br />the possibility of asking for funds to remove these as part of a <br />project. <br />Representative Patchett advised that he is having a meeting <br />with Mr. Gissendanner of the DNR Monday re aquatic preserves, and <br />they are looking at the same problem. Possibly this can be <br />solved through that program. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the Commission is still in <br />agreement with proceeding with Phase I of Joe Earman Park, and <br />Director Thomas again raised the problem of the staff work- <br />load and priorities. Discussion continued, and Commissioner <br />Scurlock felt we need a budget amendment to fund this. <br />Administrator Wright did not believe any of the permitting <br />has been done, and it will be necessary to decide what <br />Engineering can sluff off and give to someone else. He asked <br />a <br />that the Board let him get back to them on this. <br />Mr. Earman requested that when the Board does go back to <br />this, that they go for funds for the whole thing at once, not <br />just Phase I. He believed the estimate for the whole project was <br />about $40,000. <br />Commissioner Bowman wanted to thank these gentlemen for <br />their fine work on this Bill which was a very difficult job. She <br />noted that these matching funds can be used for fisheries, and <br />59 <br />DEC 41985 _ MoK 62 1"'E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.