Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 18 198S <br />Boa 63 <br />RPC ANALYSIS OF GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT ORDER <br />Staff Planner Boling made the staff presentation as follows: <br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: December 17, 1985 FILE: <br />of the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />SUBJECT: REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL <br />Ro ert M. Keatin , A STAFF REPORT AND ANALYSIS <br />Planning & Development Director FOR GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT <br />THROUGH: Mike Miller, Chief ORDER <br />Current Development Director <br />FROM: Stan Boling A.s. REFERENCES: <br />Staff Planner <br />It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider the <br />following information at their meeting of December 18, 1985. <br />DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: <br />The Grand Harbor Development of Regional Impact process has followed the <br />normal pattern of review and approval as follows: <br />1. Regional Planning Council reviewed the Application for Development <br />Approval and then transmitted recommendations for the Development <br />Order (D.O.) to the County; <br />2. County drafted and adopted the D.O.; <br />3. Regional Planning Council now reviews the adopted D.O. to ensure <br />that the regional impacts addressed in their previous recom- <br />mendations are adequately addressed in the adopted D.O. <br />The Regional Planning Council's staff has reviewed and analyzed the <br />adopted D.O. At their December 20, 1985 regular meeting the Council will <br />officially consider the staff's analysis and recommendations, and based <br />upon that information the Council will determine whether the County's <br />D.O. should be modified and whether the deficiencies are such that the <br />D.O. should be appealed if the County chooses not to change the <br />development order. <br />Council's staff, in their review and analysis report, has identified five <br />"problem" areas within the adopted D.O. Some of the problem areas are <br />minor; however, some of the areas are considered by the staff to be a <br />major concern and are issues that the Council staff feels should be <br />appealed to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. <br />Council's staff has recommended that "to assure regional issues are <br />adequately addressed, Council should vote to take an appeal of the D.O. <br />approved by Indian River County. Council's attorney should be instructed <br />to dismiss that appeal when an acceptable D.O. is received." <br />In its review of the County's adopted development order, the Regional <br />Planning Council staff identified five issues that, in the Council <br />staff's opinion, were not adequately addressed in the County D.O. These <br />issues all relate to specific items included within the Council's <br />recommendation on the Grand Harbor project which were not incorporated in <br />the County's D.O. It is the County planning staff's opinion that each of <br />the issues either should not be included in the D.O., is already included <br />_in the D.O., or needs minor modification as referenced in the D.O. <br />96 <br />