12/18/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DEC 18 198S Boa 63 RPC ANALYSIS OF GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT ORDER Staff Planner Boling made the staff presentation as follows: TO: The Honorable Members DATE: December 17, 1985 FILE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: SUBJECT: REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL Ro ert M. Keatin , A STAFF REPORT AND ANALYSIS Planning & Development Director FOR GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT THROUGH: Mike Miller, Chief ORDER Current Development Director FROM: Stan Boling A.s. REFERENCES: Staff Planner It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider the following information at their meeting of December 18, 1985. DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: The Grand Harbor Development of Regional Impact process has followed the normal pattern of review and approval as follows: 1. Regional Planning Council reviewed the Application for Development Approval and then transmitted recommendations for the Development Order (D.O.) to the County; 2. County drafted and adopted the D.O.; 3. Regional Planning Council now reviews the adopted D.O. to ensure that the regional impacts addressed in their previous recom- mendations are adequately addressed in the adopted D.O. The Regional Planning Council's staff has reviewed and analyzed the adopted D.O. At their December 20, 1985 regular meeting the Council will officially consider the staff's analysis and recommendations, and based upon that information the Council will determine whether the County's D.O. should be modified and whether the deficiencies are such that the D.O. should be appealed if the County chooses not to change the development order. Council's staff, in their review and analysis report, has identified five "problem" areas within the adopted D.O. Some of the problem areas are minor; however, some of the areas are considered by the staff to be a major concern and are issues that the Council staff feels should be appealed to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. Council's staff has recommended that "to assure regional issues are adequately addressed, Council should vote to take an appeal of the D.O. approved by Indian River County. Council's attorney should be instructed to dismiss that appeal when an acceptable D.O. is received." In its review of the County's adopted development order, the Regional Planning Council staff identified five issues that, in the Council staff's opinion, were not adequately addressed in the County D.O. These issues all relate to specific items included within the Council's recommendation on the Grand Harbor project which were not incorporated in the County's D.O. It is the County planning staff's opinion that each of the issues either should not be included in the D.O., is already included _in the D.O., or needs minor modification as referenced in the D.O. 96