My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/8/1986 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
1/8/1986 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:00 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:23:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/08/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and it was terrible. In fact, at one time Orange County wanted <br />to charge convenience stores an $110,000 impact flee. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed we have used workshop meetings <br />very well, and it would be his thought process that the <br />interested groups would be very formally involved not only in the <br />one year evaluation but the 5 year capital improvement program <br />also. He certainly felt it would be to the interests of the <br />Commission to have some kind of committee, have a liaison with <br />the various groups, and go back to workshop. <br />Mr. Robinson felt there is a need to spend more time with <br />the multi family area. He went on to address his personal <br />problem with his development on 12th St. He noted that as soon <br />as they came in with Laurel Court, they were told 12th Street had <br />to be widened and they had to give up two lots that were worth <br />$35,000; however, when he asked if he got credit for this against <br />the impact fees, he was told he would not because it isn't shown <br />on the map. Mr. Robinson felt being required to donate land and <br />then still being required to pay impact fees is something that <br />will have to be dealt with. He pointed out that the wording in <br />the ordinance indicates it is not the purpose of the ordinance to <br />collect any funds, land or public facilities from new land <br />development activity in excess of the actual amount necessary to <br />offset the demand on the county's major network system. He felt <br />when the county has people on the major road network system and <br />wants them to give all that R/W but refuses to give excess <br />credit, they are going to be faced with a situation where the <br />person will only give whatever equals his impact fee and then <br />make the county pay.for the rest of it. He did not know how the <br />county will deal with this problem. <br />Attorney Vitunac pointed out that if the development has a <br />site related roadway need, the developer will have to donate it <br />without credit and still pay an impact fee. He explained that a <br />site related need is some need on the roadway system specifically <br />related to the development itself - access, signalization, etc. _.. <br />13 <br />JAN 8 1986 63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.