Laserfiche WebLink
rJAN 15 1996 <br />BOOK 63 F;E 265 <br />Access to the Transportation Network <br />All of the land in the proposed node has or will have secondary <br />access to 49th Street (designated as a secondary collector on the <br />Thoroughfare Plan). <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission recommendation, staff recommends approval. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />Joe Idlette came before the Board representing heirs of the <br />late Rosa and William M. Cooper. who have an interest in property <br />that fronts on 49th Street, and they wish to know if that <br />property is going to remain RM -6. <br />Chief Planner Shearer stated that at the present time it is <br />anticipated that it will stay RM -6, and staff has no intention at <br />any time in the near future of initiating a rezoning for that <br />particular area. <br />Charles Price informed the Board that he owns a strip 300' <br />deep back from the railroad track fronting the entire node (his <br />back fence line is actually the boundary of the node), and staff <br />has proposed that his industrial plants would be removed from the <br />node and changed to General Industrial because they want to keep <br />the node 100 acres. He just wanted to have the Commission's <br />agreement that General Industrial is the heaviest industrial <br />usage that can be indicated as he wanted to be sure his plants <br />are in the heaviest industrial zoning district the County allows. <br />This was confirmed. <br />Bud Jenkins advised that he has a mining operation in that <br />area that is supposed to be rezoned, and he wanted to know how <br />this affects their established business. <br />Chief Planner Shearer stated that the existing mining <br />operation there is zoned agricultural and will be in the future; <br />so, this will not affect its operation. However, he believed <br />staff felt that property will be desirable for industrial <br />development at -some later date. <br />24 <br />