My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/15/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
1/15/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:00 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:25:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/15/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
enjoyed, to low density zoning across from the Hetra site,'and no <br />one is going to build residential across from industrial/ <br />commercial. His clients endorse the expansion, but see no reason <br />to jump 1-95 and they would like their property included in the <br />node jn the future. He pointed out that no one has ever opposed <br />this request. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he still has the same <br />difficulty today with expanding the node to include the multitude <br />of lots on the south side of CR 512, and he did not know how we <br />can include Mr. O'Haire's clients without including everyone. <br />Attorney O'Haire suggested that the Board could include all <br />the property on the south of CR 512 to a depth of 3001, not just <br />his clients. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if there are any single family <br />residences there, and Attorney O'Haire said there were not and <br />noted that it is not even a platted subdivision. <br />Commissioner Bird spoke of the difficulty involved in trying <br />to gather all these many lots up into one entity to get commer- <br />cial, and even then, this would back up to other residential to <br />the south. <br />Attorney O'Haire did not feel that presents an insurmount- <br />able problem; his clients accomplished this in their four blocks. <br />He further noted that there are now more stringent buffering <br />requirements than every before. <br />Discussion arose about the road R/W on CR 512, and Commis- <br />sioner Wodtke commented that he felt it would be easier to work <br />with commercial to obtain the R/W than with residential. <br />Administrator Wright felt we have about 100' R/W almost all <br />the way to the City of Sebastian. <br />The Board continued to discuss the fact that this is a <br />difficult area to deal with because of all the individual <br />ownerships involved. <br />Commissioner Lyons did not feel it makes sense to have the <br />node boundary on one side of the street. He expressed his belief <br />33 <br />JAN 15 1986 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.