Laserfiche WebLink
through normal procedures and preparing an agenda item putt staff <br />on a real tight deadline. Notification was sent to the Semblers. <br />Planner Challacombe confirmed that notice was sent on <br />January 8th to the applicant, as well as his engineer and <br />environmental consultant. Staff also notified him by telephone, <br />and the Semblers were aware of this date. <br />Mr. Mensing asked if letter couldn't be sent to the DER <br />stating that at the request of the applicant, the county's <br />response will be eight days late. He noted if this concept is <br />approved, the land will be bought, and there are a number of <br />people who stand to lose by an inadequate presentation. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, that the Board continue <br />with the hearing. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt it is unfortunate that the Semblers <br />cannot be here. He knew they are long time North County <br />residents and are concerned about the river and habitat. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if some correspondence couldn't be <br />sent to the DER saying we have agendaed this item for next week, <br />and Planner Challacombe agreed this could be done, but he did not <br />know what the impact would be. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that staff has researched this <br />and made a decision based on their expertise. <br />Planner Challacombe pointed out that the Commission did look <br />at this project about a year ago, and although there has been a <br />reduction in size, the overall ramifications are exactly the <br />same. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION on the Motion <br />to proceed with the hearing. It was voted on and <br />carried unanimously. <br />63 <br />JAN 15 1986 13ooK 63 F�nu,C- 0- <br />