Laserfiche WebLink
Scurlock felt that would amount to selective enforcement and <br />might not be constitutional. <br />Director Keating explained that uses would be considered by <br />the P 8 Z, but anyone could appeal to this Board. <br />Commissioner Wodtke had a problem with 15 people getting <br />together and calling themselves a family. He felt we must get <br />some kind of a handle on it and that we should return to the <br />former language which allowed 4 unrelated persons. <br />Chairman Scurlock wondered how much of a problem this has <br />been, and Commissioner Wodtke explained that it had not been a <br />problem before the language was changed in May, 1985. Under our <br />current definition of "family", as many as 15 unrelated persons <br />would be allowed. He felt that by going back to the former <br />language we would have the opportunity to consider individual <br />cases. <br />Attorney Palmer believed that while this ordinance would not <br />be in violation of federal law, it might be in violation of <br />future state laws. He again recommended that the County control <br />this problem through minimum square footage requirements and the <br />number of vehicles allowed. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked Mrs. Eggert if she felt that all of <br />the. items discussed today were considered at the P & Z meeting, <br />and she explained that one of the reasons that she asked for a <br />motion to table the matter at that meeting was that there was <br />some doubt that they could get a defi:nition of "family" settled, <br />but they were able to. <br />Director Keating confirmed that staff's recommendation <br />includes the two changes made by the P & Z Commission regarding <br />non -transferability and notice of a public hearing. <br />52 <br />JAN 2 2 1996 Bou 63 F UE380 <br />