My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/29/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
1/29/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:00 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
client is requesting to remain heavy industrial because-thdy <br />understand that he could not put a junk yard in there because the <br />proposed ordinance would require a 500 -ft. separation from <br />residential. He admitted his client does not have an active site <br />plan .at this time, but urged the Board to allow Mr. Pozniac to <br />use his property for a salvage yard, the purpose he purchased it <br />for 15 years ago. <br />Commissioner Lyons asked what limitations CL would have on <br />Mr. Pozniac's property, and Mr. Shearer explained that while he <br />would not be allowed to build a salvage yard, he could have <br />anything from a restaurant to mini -storage warehouses, light <br />manufacturing activities such as candy and confections, chemical <br />and allied products, dairy products, electronic equipment, <br />fabricated metal, extracts and syrups, etc. <br />Richard Pozniac addressed the Board and repeated his <br />attorney's arguments, explaining that he has not built the junk <br />yard as yet because of financial and medical problems. <br />Mr. Shearer stated that a salvage yard is a special <br />exception use, and it has to be 500 feet from residential. Even <br />if Mr. Pozniac's property was zoned CG, he could not have a <br />salvage yard because of that restriction. <br />Mr. Pozniac asked when this all came about, because he has <br />been unaware of all these things going on with his property as he <br />lives in Ft. Pierce. He stressed that he heard about this <br />rezoning just two week ago, and compared this process to living <br />in Russia. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that the process must work fairly <br />well, because Mr. Pozniac is here tonight and the Board is <br />receiving his input. <br />Commissioner Bird explained that the action we are taking <br />tonight is having an effect on approximately 800 of the land mass <br />in the county and if we tried to notify each and every property <br />owner individually, the mailing would run in the hundreds of <br />11 <br />JAN 2 9 1986 Bou 63 PAc-t 471 <br />V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.