Laserfiche WebLink
has to be taken into consideration, but felt even that can be <br />negotiated. <br />Administrator Wright believed about a dozen options have to <br />be considered and brought back. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that we also have a real time <br />constraint with financing because of the new resolution passed by <br />Congress, which possibly could require spending 50 of the total <br />bond proceeds within the first 30 days and, in addition, possibly <br />could eliminate all arbitrage. <br />Discussion continued re the impact of such Congressional _ <br />action on county financing. <br />Commissioner Bird expressed his concern and disappointment <br />with the delay in the permitting process, which he had understood <br />was Mr. Garl's responsibility. He wanted to find out what has <br />caused the delay and also would like to find out what risk is <br />involved in proceeding while the permitting is in process. He <br />felt that planting is a very important factor. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that the permitting first was <br />involved only with consumptive use, but now they are talking <br />about water quality, which is something new. He did not think we <br />.can be critical of Mr. Garl because of this. <br />Commissioner Bird hoped to have all the information <br />available by the next meeting, and it was generally agreed we <br />should move ahead as fast as we can. <br />APPOINTMENT TO PROPOSED_ COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS <br />The Board reviewed the following letter from the Attorney <br />for St. Lucie County: <br />75 <br />BOOK 63 564 <br />