Laserfiche WebLink
F"—,— <br />FEB i. 9 8 '1 <br />Bou 63 pnE 710 <br />their system of rating rather than have them show the evaluation <br />to the employee and then have it whited out and changed when the <br />employee has been led to believe he would be getting a good <br />rating and then gets something else. <br />The Administrator agreed we must try to standardize our <br />evaluation process. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else present wished to be <br />heard. There were none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the situation of people being <br />topped out and not receiving an increase is being followed <br />consistently throughout the county - white collar and blue collar <br />alike - and this was confirmed. Commissioner -Bird felt that it <br />is quite possible we may have some adjustments result from the <br />study being made. <br />Administrator Wright stated that one of the things he empha- <br />sized to the consultant was that the study must be as objective <br />as he can make it. If the study shows that there are some <br />serious disparities, he will recommend to that Board that we <br />correct them. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt the problem has arisen in the past <br />where we could not attract and keep the type of people needed <br />because of the salaries offered, and we have voted to change <br />them. <br />Administrator Wright cited the case of a Code Enforcement <br />officer who had been with the county for fifteen years and was <br />topped out for two years because the job was only worth just so <br />much money. <br />Discussion continued re advancing by changing pay grades and <br />moving into a higher pay scale, and Bob Valentine of Fleet <br />20 <br />� � r <br />