Laserfiche WebLink
drip edge. He noted the amount of money involved just to get the <br />Courthouse looking decent is unbelievable. <br />Buildings Superintendent Lynn Williams did not think there <br />would be a big difference in price for aluminum drip edge. <br />i <br />Commissioner Lyons proposed a Motion to accept the Bid of <br />Lucas Waterproofing, but Attorney Vitunac pointed out that the <br />firms are not bidding on the same items - one is bidding on a <br />complete strip down and the other is partial. <br />Superintendent Williams reported that he talked to Lucas <br />Waterproofing again this morning re stripping the entire roof <br />off. They claim it isn't necessary; that they could guarantee <br />their roof without stripping off all the old roof, and it would <br />be $6,000 additional to tear off the entire roof. <br />Administrator Wright suggested that we go ahead and have the <br />entire roof torn off for the additional $6,000. <br />General Services Director Dean noted that we are going to be <br />in litigation on this and expressed concern as to how increasing <br />the bid to the larger amount of money might affect our recovering <br />those costs. <br />Attorney Vitunac believed our roofing people and the <br />Administrator feel it is best to get the soggy old roof out from <br />underneath the new one. There is a chance that if we go to court <br />with the former roofer, we may have to eat the additional $6,000, <br />but we are asking for a lot more money than just the cost of the <br />roof, and he felt the Board should have the roof done the way <br />they want it done. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wodtke, to award the Bid for the Court- <br />house roof to Lucas Waterproofing Co., including <br />$6,000 additional to remove the complete roof, or a <br />total of $39,000; the drip edge to be aluminum rather <br />than galvanized. <br />53 <br />BOOK 63 Fr1cC 786 <br />