My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/5/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
3/5/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:32:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/05/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Wodtke asked if there is any possibility that a <br />deed restriction could be written on that 250 feet to give a <br />reasonable assurance to the adjacent residents, but Attorney <br />Stewart felt that a deed restriction certainly could be imposed <br />when they came back for simultaneous rezoning and site plan <br />approval on the portion of the 10 -acre tract left agricultural. <br />The deed restriction would prohibit any structures being built <br />within 250 feet of the common property line, which, in essence, <br />is what is being promised. He felt that would have to go through <br />a 2 -step scenario, however. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if the removal of the 250 -ft. deed <br />restriction would be subject to the approval of the adjacent <br />residents, and Attorney Stewart confirmed that it could be <br />written that way. He stressed that there are a number of people <br />in the subdivision who are in favor of the project, and presented <br />a petition signed by 19 people representing 13 households in <br />Sunnydale Acres Subdivision. <br />(SAID PETITION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) <br />In conclusion, Attorney Stewart urged the Board to rezone <br />the subject property since the request is in conformance with the <br />Comp Plan and the County's Overall Economic Development Plan <br />which encourages affordable housing. <br />Commissioner Lyons wanted it on record that there would be <br />no on-site sewer plant or water plant. <br />Wallace Smith, 1646 71st Avenue, strongly opposed the <br />rezoning. He noted that after this same developer was successful <br />in having a tract on the north side of SR -60 rezoned to multiple - <br />family residential, he walked away from it. Mr. Smith wondered <br />if the same thing could happen here, and whether it also might <br />set a precedent for RM -6 from 43rd Avenue to 1-95 on the south <br />side of SR -60. <br />Michael Tippin, 1815 71st Avenue, expressed concern about <br />the development's impact on their quiet neighborhood. Although a <br />lot of it is zoned at 6 units per acre, most of it has been <br />17 <br />MAR 5 19� soon �°:,c 7192 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.