My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/22/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:55:27 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:37:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee Update
Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc. Presentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Charlie Wilson, Vero Beach, has been in contact with the School Board for the last six <br />months, and he was disturbed that the information from the School Board was not available in <br />the Study. <br />Administrator Baird interrupted Mr. Wilson, explaining that it was his decision with his <br />staff to remove the School Board, as to not slow up the process, and he said he would take full <br />responsibility. <br />Mr. Wilson continued to inform the Board that he was aware of the fact that the School <br />Board projects losing 500 students a year, and he questioned how the School Board could <br />increase impact fees when they are reducing capacity. He told the Board that the School <br />Board's estimate of population in 2020 is roughly 40,000 more than the County's projection. He <br />posed questions to the Consultant regarding the affordable and achieved LOS, and wanted to <br />know how they are dealing with a surplus. <br />Mr. Tindale provided a general answer, stating that they have been conservative and <br />only charged the minimum the County has achieved, and if they achieved better than they <br />adopted, the Consultant will not let the County charge for it until they have adopted it. In <br />response to Commissioner Davis's request to make it clearer, he said he could put formulas in <br />the report, provide examples, and give them advice to tie the two together in the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Mr. Wilson continued addressing the current 2005 Comprehensive Plan methodology <br />versus this Study's methodology. He accused the County of overcharging $50 million dollars by <br />changing the methodology, the starting point, and the way we adopt the Comprehensive Plan. <br />He critiqued further the Affordable Growth Strategy. <br />Mr. Tindale reiterated several times that he was comfortable with the methodology used <br />and the Affordable Growth Strategy. <br />Impact Fee Update Workshop <br />January 22, 2014 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.