My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/22/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee Update Study Workshop
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Credit Component <br />Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit <br />The present value of the portion of non -impact fee revenues (converted to equivalent gasoline <br />taxes) generated by a new development over a 25 -year period that is projected to be expended <br />on capacity expansion projects is credited against the cost of the system consumed by travel <br />associated with new development. <br />County <br />A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the FY 2014- <br />•, <br />2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) shows that allroadway projects ,are being funded by a <br />combination of fuel taxes, sales tax, grants,�.developer funds, and transportation impact fees. <br />- <br />Currently, capacity -adding projects in the county are primarily funded with'fuel,tax and sales tax <br />revenues. Based on the FY 2014-2017.CIP and discussionswith County staff, it was'assumed that <br />sales tax revenues will only be available toifund transportation capacity over the next five years, <br />and will not be a recurring revenue source: Therefore, only Sive years of sales tax revenues are <br />included in the credit calculations. If the'sales fax -is ie -adopted in -2019 or a different revenue <br />source is allocated to`thetransportation capacity to replace the sales tax revenues, these credit <br />figures may need tSo be:revised. As'shown in Table,X-6, the sales•tax portion of the county credit <br />was separated from' the\total county credit' and all non -impact fee funding allocated to <br />transportation:capacity wa`sconverted toequivalent gas tax revenues. A total gas tax equivalent <br />revenue credit of 11.1 pennies•.was given for.sales.tax revenues and 5.6 pennies was given for all <br />y <br />other -revenue sources.' _- . <br />State \ <br />State expenditures on state roads`were reviewed, and a credit for the capacity expansion portion <br />attributable to state, projects` was estimated. The equivalent number of pennies allocated to <br />fund state projects was-deterrnined from projects spanning a 10 -year period (2009-2018). This <br />period represents past expenditures (from 2009 to 2013) from the FDOT Work Program and the <br />projected expenditures (from 2014 to 2018) from the current Transportation Improvement <br />Program (TIP). A list of capacity -adding roadway projects was developed, including lane <br />additions, new road construction, intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal <br />projects, and other capacity -addition projects. This review (summarized in Appendix D, Table D- <br />3) indicates that FDOT spending generates an equivalent gas tax credit of 15.5 pennies of gas tax <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 112 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.