My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/22/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee Update Study Workshop
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Table A-3 <br />Residents per Housing Unit (Unincorporated IRC) <br />Housing Type <br />Single Family <br />- Less than 1,500 sf <br />- 1,500 to 2,499 sf <br />- 2,500 sf or greater <br />Multi-Famil /Accesso <br />Mobile Home <br />Weighted Average <br />Population(1) <br />54,671 <br />11,944 <br />7,454 <br />74,069 <br />Housing <br />Units <br />22,384 <br />8,536 <br />5,378 <br />36,298 <br />Ratio"' <br />92% <br />100% <br />Residents / <br />Housing <br />Units'" <br />2.44 <br />2.24 <br />2.44 <br />2.71 <br />1.40 <br />1.39 <br />2.04 <br />Residents / <br />Housing Units <br />with 2010Adj's' <br />2.27 <br />2.09 <br />2.27 <br />2.53 <br />1.30 <br />1.30 <br />1.90 <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />(5) <br />Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population)._ <br />Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 <br />Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American•Housing Survey <br />Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2)'r <br />Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000,are,adjusted downward by 6.8.percent to reflect the <br />decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 / <br />{ -Table A-4 <br />Residents per Housing Unit ((RC -excluding Indian River Shores) <br />Housing Type <br />Single Family <br />- Less than 1,500 sf <br />- 1,500 to 2,499 sf,_ <br />- 2,500 sf_ br greater;,--:',,, <br />Multi-Famil %Accessory, <br />Mobile Home <br />Weighted Average <br />Population('' <br />84,211 <br />-„18,571 <br />10,516 <br />113;298 <br />Housing <br />Units(2) <br />34; 673 <br />'13,513 <br />=6, 786 <br />54,972 <br />Ratio(3) <br />92% <br />100% <br />Residents/ <br />Housing <br />Units(4) <br />2.43 <br />2.24 <br />2.43 <br />2.70 <br />1.37 <br />1.55 <br />2.06 <br />Residents / <br />Housing Units <br />with 2010Adj(5) <br />2.26 <br />2.09 <br />2.26 <br />2.52 <br />1.28 <br />1.44 <br />1.92 <br />(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H733:(adjusted:for peak seasonal population) <br />(2) Source: 2000ensus, Table H-30 <br />(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey <br />(4) Population (Item'1):divided by housing units (Item 2) <br />(5) Residents per housing unit.liased`on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the <br />decrease in people per housindunit between 2000 and 2010 <br />Functional Population <br />Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted <br />methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for <br />certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including <br />residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 <br />A-4 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.