My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/12/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
3/12/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:09:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/12/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 12 19 8.6 BOOK�3 PAIJ 77 <br />Director Davis explained that the Fultz family has just a <br />single family residence, and it could not be developed into <br />anything too large. On the White parcel there is a fairly <br />expensive home and an electrical business plus a lake and a <br />tennis court, and he doubted Mr. White will do anything more with <br />it any time in the near future. Director Davis further noted <br />that staff will work with the property owners re their driveways, <br />but he did not feel we can address giving them priority to access <br />the sewer line. <br />Chairman Scurlock agreed that we have a standard policy re <br />the sewer line. He believed the Motion indicates we still would <br />have our options open, and he felt the Motion should make it <br />clear that the Attorney and appraisal fees are included along <br />with the fair market value. <br />In further discussion, it was agreed that the attorney and <br />appraisal fee are to be included in the fair market value. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Director Davis reported that staff is working on the parcel <br />to the north with the Postweilers, who are taking the position <br />that they want their zoning in place before they donate the R/W, <br />which is worth about $50,000. We have indicated that we need the <br />R/W now and while we understand their application is being <br />processed for zoning,, we can't wait. We don't want to have to <br />buy that R/W, and Director Davis believed it helped staff last <br />time to have a Commission member sit with them and communicate <br />with these people just for the creditability of the county's <br />intent not to do anything adverse to them. He noted they are <br />also working on three others and feel good about those. <br />Chairman Scurlock offered his assistance. <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.