Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 19 1986 <br />BOOK 63• FnAV <br />Carolyn Eggert, Chairman of the Planning & Zoning <br />Commission, believed the Commissioners have been increasingly <br />unhappy with the minor site plan process and would like very much <br />to revisit what is required in a minor site plan. <br />Attorney Vitunac felt that a temporary solution to the Moose <br />problem is to have them pay their money in escrow under protest <br />with the stipulation that when this issue is revisited by the <br />Commission in a month or two and changes are made in the minor <br />site plan requirements, they would get their money back. If no <br />changes are made, then they already would have complied with the <br />ordinance. Commissioner Lyons understood then that we could <br />agree that their money would be in an interest bearing account. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that the Moose had two options today: <br />Go ahead and pay under protest, or withdraw their site plan and <br />submit at a later date. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that we can table the matter <br />until such time as the issue is revisited and that way they would <br />not have to pay another site plan application fee. <br />Mr. Franks agreed to having the Moose Lodge appeal tabled <br />until such time as staff has addressed the minor site plan <br />__ requirements for sidewalks. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously <br />tabled this item until staff has addressed the <br />minor site plan requirements. <br />Commissioner Bird instructed staff to come back to the Board <br />with a recommendation as soon as possible so that the Moose could <br />proceed with their building addition. <br />Nancy Offutt asked if this matter could be opened up to a <br />workshop, and the Board indicated that would be a fine idea. <br />37 <br />