My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/2/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
4/2/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:36:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/02/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Boa 64 PAGE :32 <br />to develop a 300' strip in multiple family as he personally lives <br />in a condo development built on a piece of property 330' wide by <br />1320' deep, and there are 116 units on that 10 acres. <br />Commissioner Bowman agreed with Vice Chairman Lyons that thee' <br />residents are indeed living very dangerously if they do not <br />change the Plan. The RS -6 may have been appropriate when the <br />Comprehensive Plan was first adopted, but she felt we have been <br />remiss in not realizing there were all these acreage tracts <br />developed in a very nice suburban area. <br />Commissioner Wodtke believed staff's remark that it would be <br />unlikely there would be a development of 6 units per acre in the <br />area related to the well and septic tank requirements which have <br />kept changing over the years and also the fact that someone would <br />need a piece of land large enough to be supportive of installing <br />a sewer plant or water plant if they wished to achieve that <br />density. Commissioner Wodtke then addressed the years spent <br />developing the Comprehensive Plan, trying to determine where to <br />place single family residential, multi family, etc., and noted it <br />was believed logical to put heavier densities closer to town and <br />U.S.I so they would be nearer to the primary collectors and to <br />the availability of services rather than out between Kings <br />Highway and Ranch Road. Commissioner Wodtke could understand the <br />Planning & Zoning Commission making their recommendation, but he <br />could also understand the applicant trying to do a project they <br />had thought was acceptable and had community support, which <br />apparently it does not. Commissioner Wodtke stated he had a few <br />questions he wished to ask Attorney Block privately. <br />The Vice Chairman called for a short recess. <br />After reconvening the meeting with the same members present, <br />Chairman Scurlock remaining out of the room, the Vice Chairman <br />asked for a Motion. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, to deny the appeal made by <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.