My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/9/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
4/9/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 9 1966 BOOK 64 raE 82 <br />H.—Approval of Bid for Caretaking of County Grove <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 4/1/86: <br />FLORIDA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE <br />UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA <br />INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES <br />I FAS <br />COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE <br />AO RICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS <br />SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE <br />w <br />2001-9 Ave., #303 <br />REPLY TO: Vero Beach, FL 32960-6414 <br />April 1, 1986 <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners n <br />FROM: Tommy Thomas, Intergovernmental Relations ' <br />Steve Futch, County Extension Agent- Citrus .sar� 4IJ-A' <br />SUBJECT: Approval of Bid for Caretaking of County Grove <br />We recommend that the Board accept the low bid received. <br />This bid was submitted by Sexton Grove Service of Vero Beach. <br />The low bid was for $492.50 per acre for the balance of 1986. <br />Sexton Grove Service will provide the total caretaking, management, <br />and materials necessary to continue to market the grapefruit in <br />the fresh fruit market. They also understand that the fruit will <br />be sold by the standard bid procedure as was conducted in 1985. <br />Sexton Grove Service has also recommended that the flapgate <br />on the pump be repaired and a small pump placed near the pumphouse <br />to further lower the water table in the grove. <br />Commissioner Bird felt they have given us an estimated cost <br />for the normal care of the grove, but it actually will be billed <br />on a time and material basis. Intergovernmental Relations <br />Director Tommy Thomas confirmed that we had the same type of <br />agreement last year. <br />Commissioner Bird questioned whether we need major service <br />or minimal service on the grove, and Director Thomas anticipated <br />that this grove would be in operation for a number of years and <br />we are looking for maximum production. <br />Stephen Futch, County Agricultural Extension Agent, <br />explained that the grove's drainage problems must be solved if <br />the County plans on having productive groves over a period of <br />years. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.