Laserfiche WebLink
APR * 9 1996 BOOK 64 FA,J06 <br />Overall, the County's fund equity rose about 14%. <br />Pages 28 8 29 show the Combined Statement of Revenue <br />Expenditures and changes in fund balance for all your governmen- <br />tal fund types, which does not include the enterprise operations. <br />Total revenues were about 271 million, up about 18%, and <br />expenditures were about 28 million, up about 15%. The County <br />about broke even last year and has a relatively good fund <br />balance. The General Fund is also in relatively good shape as <br />far as fund balance as a percentage of expenditures is concerned. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted the General Revenue Funds were <br />increased over the previous year by $4,356,000, but if you look <br />at the total revenues compared with the increase in expenditures, <br />it looks as if what we have done is invaded cash carry forward <br />and contingency funds again the second year in a row. He <br />emphasized that is a dangerous habit and we need to be cautious <br />about continuing this practice. <br />Mr. Landorf agreed with, but noted the Board did not go into <br />it very much. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the fund balances at the end of <br />the year were approximately the same as last year, and Mr. <br />Landorf stated that they were pretty much -the same; they actually <br />were down about $60,000. <br />Chairman Scurlock brought up the fact that we actually are a <br />year ahead of this report, and he felt, especially in regard to <br />bond coverage, this can be a little misleading as to what current <br />conditions are. He referred to page 5 of the Letter of Trans- <br />mittal which shows 1.53 bond coverage in 1983 which increased to <br />1.81 and then again this year to 1.91, and believed the question <br />that arises is why we are having rate increases if our bond <br />coverage is increasing by those amounts. <br />Mr. Landorf agreed this can be misleading, but noted that <br />you have to be careful when you look at bond coverage because it <br />does not include factors for replacing the plant and equipment; <br />34 <br />