Laserfiche WebLink
7 APR 16 196 � 1� <br />F'1 <br />BOOK 4 , <br />create additional residential areas. He did think Oslo Road <br />eventually will have more commercial, but not necessarily CH. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried 4 to 1 with <br />Chairman Scurlock voting in opposition. <br />Administrator Wright asked if the Board had some direction <br />for staff, and Commissioner Bowman emphasized we must get 10th <br />Court paved. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he would like us to look at <br />acquiring additional right-of-way, and Commissioner Wodtke wished <br />to develop a map of ownership in the area, look into right-of- <br />way,and determine the potential for the area. <br />Chairman Scurlock was not in favor of any of this. He <br />emphasized that the Commission is not in the subdivision <br />business. That is the province of the Housing Authority. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, to present the problem with the Oslo <br />area to the Housing Authority and ask them to come up <br />with a proposed solution. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the Housing Authority working <br />with the Planning Department. Commissioner Bird did not have a <br />problem with that but noted this also can be accomplished with <br />any private developer. <br />Commissioner Lyons concurred this really is not our job, but <br />the business of the Housing Authority, and Chairman Scurlock <br />again emphasized that he did not want to be .involved with.doing <br />subdivisions and relocation, especially as there are areas <br />similar to this all over the county. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />32 <br />