Laserfiche WebLink
A P R 16 1986 <br />BOOK 64 <br />Also, subsequent to the agreement the Division of Utility Services approved <br />plans for the construction of the on-site water and wastewater systems <br />needed to provide water and wastewater service to the proposed shopping center. <br />CONDITIONS <br />The construction of the South Vero Square Shopping Center has long ceased and <br />it appears that it may not resume in the near future, if at all. In addition, <br />Commercial Center Development Corporation has failed to comply with its agreed <br />upon terms of the wastewater agreement that was approved by the Board in <br />February 1985, and there is question as to whether they ever will comply. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff's position is that Commercial Center Development Corporation has failed <br />to comply with the originally executed agreement and in view of the extensive <br />passing of time and questionable continuation of the South Vero Square Shopping <br />Center all agreements and approvals by the County should be reconsidered and <br />executed anew. Staff therefore recommends and requests that the Board of <br />County Commissioners officially void any and all utility agreements and permits <br />or authorizations heretofore executed or issued by the Board and the Division <br />of Utility Services. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed Director Pinto is simply asking <br />for authorization to move in this direction and does not require <br />any action today. <br />Director Pinto advised that unfortunately staff did not know <br />Commercial Center Development Corporation's building permit had <br />expired and it was extended for 90 days, or they would have tried <br />to stop it at that point. He emphasized that the corporation is <br />asking us to just wait around, and without funds we can't reserve <br />any capacity. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously <br />accepted staff's recommendation and authorized <br />them to move in that direction if no other <br />solution can be reached. <br />GOLF COURSE - AWARD OF BONDS, RESOLUTIONS, ETC_ <br />Jud Freeman, Bond Counsel of the firm of Freeman, <br />Richardson, Watson 8 Kelly, Jacksonville, informed the Board that <br />the bond insurers have asked for some changes in the original <br />Resolution authorizing the construction and equipment of a public <br />golf course, No. 85-78 adopted July 17, 1985, and he has no great <br />50 <br />