Laserfiche WebLink
Other than the Future Land Use Map, the goals, objectives, and policies are the most important <br />parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which <br />the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action <br />committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. <br />While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in <br />reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are Future Land Use <br />Element Policies 1.17 and 1.18. <br />• Future Land Use Element Policies 1.17 and 1.18 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.17 states that all commercial/industrial uses must be located <br />within the county's Urban Service Area. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.18 states that the <br />commercial/industrial land use designation shall permit uses that include retail, office, and service <br />commercial development. <br />Since the subject property is located within the County's Urban Service Area and the requested <br />CG district is intended for uses permitted within the commercial/industrial land use designation, <br />the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policies 1.17 and 1.18. <br />While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other Comprehensive Plan <br />policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for <br />consistency with all applicable, plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff <br />determined that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that either the current zoning district or the requested zoning district is <br />appropriate for the site and that development under the requested zoning district will be compatible <br />with surrounding land uses. Generally, sites such as the subject property that front on major roads <br />and are not adjacent to residential areas are appropriate for any one of several different commercial <br />zoning districts, including CL, CG, and CH. Like the subject property, land to the north and south <br />is zoned CH. Land to the east and west is zoned CG. Since CH and CG are both commercial <br />districts, since the requested zoning district is an expansion of the zoning district to the east and <br />west of the subject property, and since this site is separated from other sites by Oslo Road, Old <br />Dixie Highway SW, and the FEC Railroad, no incompatibilities with adjacent properties are <br />anticipated with the rezoning of the subject site from CH to CG. <br />For those reasons, it is staff's position that development of the site under the requested CG district <br />will be compatible with surrounding areas. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />The subject property is an undeveloped site with native and non-native invasive species of <br />vegetation. A 2002 survey of the property identified ±0.81 acres of jurisdictional wetlands on the <br />eastern portion of the parcel adjacent to the FEC railroad right-of-way. County environmental <br />planning staff has determined that the subject wetlands are impacted and have a relatively low <br />7 <br />139 <br />