Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 7 1966 <br />BOOK 64 FA;c,3 d 2 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Bird, the Board unanimously accepted the needs <br />analysis update figures for the purpose of the <br />Howell/Chapman property acquisition. <br />Further discussion ensued about continuing to work to <br />reinforce and substantiate these figures. <br />Attorney Vitunac noted that he would like permission to send <br />Attorney Barkett to Tallahassee when the DNR reevaluates our <br />priority list. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that was covered in the <br />Attorney's budget, but Attorney Vitunac felt possibly it should <br />be out of the Parks budget. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he would like to go also and <br />felt this can be worked out when we get information about the <br />meeting. <br />MOORINGS SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2, PARCEL B <br />Attorney Barkett reviewed the following memo: <br />TO: DATE: FILE: <br />Indian River County Board April 29, 1.986 <br />of County_Commissioners <br />SUBJECT: <br />MOORINGS SUBDIVISION <br />UNIT 2, PARCEL B <br />FROM: Bruce BarketREFERENCES: <br />t� <br />Assistant County Attorney <br />The property referenced above was deeded by warranty deed by the <br />Moorings Development Company to Indian River County in 1970 for <br />use as a right of way to connect Mooring Line Drive with a bridge <br />to the mainland. The warranty deed does not contain a reverter <br />clause. However, the deed does contain restrictions which purport <br />to limit the use of the property for a public utilities right of <br />way until such time as a bridge is constructed. Two title in— <br />surance companies have determined that the deed is not insurable <br />in its present form. <br />86 <br />