Laserfiche WebLink
64 BOOK F,1,F,30) 4 <br />Mr. Little asked for some direction from the Council, and <br />Mayor Cochrane believed everyone had indicated their agreement to <br />working together on items 2 through 6. <br />SOLID WASTE <br />Under _item _1, Director Pinto noted that the County is 30 <br />days away from receiving the studies on the solid waste master <br />plan, which includes the City of Vero Beach and the other munici- <br />palities in the county since all solid waste should end up at the <br />County Landfill. The consultants have been looking for some <br />alternative methods to landfilling, but in the long run, we will <br />have to look at when it will become cost feasible to move on to <br />something else. He emphasized that there will always be a <br />landfill because there will always be some kind of waste that <br />cannot be treated or dissolved. The consultants, in conjunction <br />with an accounting firm, also are looking at a rate methodology <br />that would be fair and equitable and are considering a per parcel <br />assessment approach. Director Pinto felt that tipping fees will <br />be constantly increasing due to the cost of the equipment <br />required.. He pointed out the unfairness in having people in some <br />parts of the county using the transfer stations without paying <br />any tipping fees while others are paying franchised haulers on a <br />monthly basis to take their trash to the County Landfill. <br />Director Pinto believed everyone should pay their fair share, and <br />that our attorneys have to come up with a way for the cities to <br />come up with a way to charge a per parcel charge. The Landfill <br />is only going to become more and more expensive and we are going <br />to have to look at alternatives, especially with regard to <br />hazardous wastes. <br />Commissioner Bowman and Councilman Acor reported that these <br />problems are being discussed by the newly formed Tri -County <br />Committee. <br />Mr. Little agreed that the tipping fee system was <br />inequitable, but had some reservations about the per parcel <br />9 <br />