5/13/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

assessment. He felt, however, that these are things which can be discussed as we move along. It was agreed that a resource recovery facility could be a joint effort by the City and County if such a course of action is , found to be cost feasible. PLANNING Under items 1 and 2, it was agreed that the City and County would cooperate more fully in land use planning and redefining City limit lines, with special attention given to the north and south U.S. #1 areas. Commissioner Lyons wished to make sure that the City and County master plans are compatible with respect to boundaries, and the Council and Commission indicated their approval of staff preparing a formal agreement on these issues. Mr. Little advised that the City has reached "agreement on a staff level in regard to deannexing certain areas to the north in order to redefine city limit lines which will make it easier for developers, and Commissioner Lyons added that it will also make law enforcement easier. Mr. Little reported that two of three ordinances on these areas have passed the first reading and public hearings are scheduled for early June. The Council denied the third ordinance which is the wetlands, an area for which the City wishes to remain in control until we see how things work out. That might change after more is learned about what the Regional Planning Council is going to require, and the Council might want to revisit the matter at that time. Robert Keating, County Director of Planning & Development, and Dennis Ragsdale, Asst. Director of City Planning, referred to a map outlining the following three areas proposed for deannexation: 1) The area north of the Main Relief Canal along the east side of U.S. #1 up to 33rd Street, which includes the R.D. Carter Subdivision; 2) a 200 -ft. wide strip running north of the R. D. 10 MAY 13 1986 =395 J